Microplastics and Safety

Chapter 6: The Microplastics Question

Understanding the Concern

Microplastics in food and beverages are a growing concern. When using 3D-printed plastics for coffee brewing, we must address this honestly.

What Are Microplastics?

Definition

  • Plastic particles <5mm in diameter
  • Include both primary and secondary sources
  • Found throughout the environment
  • Potential health impacts still being studied

Sources in Coffee Brewing

  1. Plastic equipment wear
  2. Filter materials breakdown
  3. Water supply contamination
  4. Packaging materials

3D Printing Specific Concerns

Layer Adhesion Issues

  • Poor bonding creates particle release
  • Mechanical stress causes delamination
  • Hot water accelerates degradation

Surface Roughness

  • FDM printing creates textured surfaces
  • Higher surface area for potential release
  • Micro-crevices trap particles

Material Degradation

  • UV exposure weakens polymers
  • Chemical interaction with coffee acids
  • Thermal cycling causes brittleness

Testing and Measurement

Visual Inspection Methods

  1. Microscope examination (40x minimum)
  2. Before/after weight comparison
  3. Surface degradation monitoring
  4. Water filtration testing

Professional Testing

  • Spectroscopy analysis
  • Particle counting methods
  • Chemical composition verification
  • Not accessible to most makers

Risk Mitigation Strategies

Design Approaches

  1. Minimize surface area in contact with coffee
  2. Smooth flow paths reduce turbulence
  3. Thick walls for durability
  4. Avoid sharp edges that could break

Material Selection

  • PCTG shows excellent stability
  • High-quality filament reduces additives
  • Avoid recycled materials for food contact
  • FDA-approved formulations when available

Printing Best Practices

✓ 100% infill (no voids)
✓ Extra perimeters (4+)
✓ Higher temperatures (better fusion)
✓ Slow printing (quality over speed)
✓ Post-processing (smoothing)

Usage Guidelines

  1. Pre-wash thoroughly before first use
  2. Regular inspection for wear
  3. Replace periodically (6-12 months)
  4. Gentle cleaning only
  5. Avoid abrasives

Comparative Risk Assessment

Traditional Products

  • Paper filters: bleaching chemicals
  • Metal filters: manufacturing residues
  • Plastic components: injection molding additives
  • Silicone parts: curing agents

3D Printed Parts

  • Known material composition
  • Controllable process
  • No mold release agents
  • Customizable for safety

Scientific Perspective

Current Research

  • Limited studies on FDM food contact
  • Most focus on injection molded plastics
  • Particle release varies by material
  • Long-term effects unknown

Precautionary Principle

Given unknowns, we recommend: 1. Minimize plastic contact time 2. Use lowest safe temperatures 3. Replace parts showing wear 4. Consider alternatives when possible

Practical Recommendations

For Concerned Users

  1. Use metal mesh inserts
  2. Line with paper filters
  3. Limit to cold brew applications
  4. Print in PCTG only

The snowflake pattern design - balancing flow restriction with cleanability

Monitoring Your Parts

Check monthly for: - Surface crazing - Color changes
- Brittleness - Rough textures - Missing material

Alternative Approaches

Hybrid Designs

  • 3D printed frame + steel mesh
  • Silicone gaskets (cast, not printed)
  • Removable/replaceable components

Future Materials

  • Medical grade resins
  • Ceramic composites
  • Bio-based polymers
  • Metal printing (when accessible)

Honest Assessment

What We Know

  • Some particle release is likely
  • Quality matters significantly
  • Proper printing reduces risk
  • Regular replacement helps

What We Don’t Know

  • Exact release quantities
  • Long-term health impacts
  • Optimal replacement schedule
  • Best testing methods

Making Informed Choices

Everyone must assess their own risk tolerance. This project provides: - Transparent material information - Best practices for safety - Alternative design options - Honest discussion of unknowns

As stated in the project description: “This is a DIY project; decide your own comfort level with plastic contact. If you’d rather avoid it entirely, grab the supplied STEP files and CNC the cap in stainless steel or aluminum instead.”

The goal is informed consent, not fear-mongering or dismissal of legitimate concerns.

Moving Forward

Research continues on plastic safety. Meanwhile: 1. Follow best practices 2. Monitor your equipment 3. Stay informed on research 4. Share findings with community

Next chapter: Contributing to open-source hardware development.